Mentors-2

Student Had Same Area of Interest as Mentor

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

No

10

30%

8

57%

18

38%

Yes

19

58%

6

43%

25

53%

No Answer

4

12%

0

0%

4

9%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

 Importance of Student Having Similar Research Interests

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Very important

10

30%

6

43%

16

34%

Important

14

42%

4

29%

18

38%

Somewhat important

8

24%

4

29%

12

26%

Not important

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Satisfaction with Mentor-Student Match

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all satisfied

3

9%

0

0%

3

6%

Not very satisfied

0

0%

1

7%

1

2%

Somewhat satisfied

4

12%

0

0%

4

9%

Satisfied

6

18%

7

50%

13

28%

Very satisfied

18

55%

6

43%

24

51%

No Answer

2

6%

0

0%

2

4%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Expected Mentee Contribution to Research Project

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

None at all

4

12%

1

7%

5

11%

Very little

7

21%

5

36%

12

26%

Somewhat

13

39%

5

36%

18

38%

A fair amount

5

15%

3

21%

8

17%

A lot

4

12%

0

0%

4

9%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Extent to Which Student's Work Matched Expected Contribution to Research Project

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Much more than expected

6

18%

1

7%

7

15%

More than expected

11

33%

3

21%

14

30%

What expected

10

30%

7

50%

17

36%

Less than expected

2

6%

0

0%

2

4%

Much less than expected

4

12%

3

21%

7

15%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Overall Satisfaction with Student

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not satisfied at all

3

9%

1

7%

4

9%

Not very satisfied

1

3%

1

7%

2

4%

Somewhat satisfied

1

3%

1

7%

2

4%

Satisfied

8

24%

5

36%

13

28%

Very satisfied

20

61%

6

43%

26

55%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Extent to Which Participation in DMP has Taken Away from Progress on Own Work

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all

7

21%

6

43%

13

28%

Very little

11

33%

2

14%

13

28%

Somewhat

11

33%

5

36%

16

34%

A fair amount

2

6%

1

7%

3

6%

Too much

2

6%

0

0%

2

4%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Extent to Which Time Spent with Student Matched Expectations

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Much less than expected

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

Less than expected

5

15%

2

14%

7

15%

What expected

20

61%

9

64%

29

62%

More than expected

4

12%

3

21%

7

15%

Much more than expected

3

9%

0

0%

3

6%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Feelings About the Amount of Time Spent on Program

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not enough time spent

15

45%

5

36%

20

43%

Right amount of time

14

42%

7

50%

21

45%

Too much time

2

6%

2

14%

4

9%

Way too much time

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

No Answer

2

6%

0

0%

2

4%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Satisfaction with Student Preparedness

1996

Total

Percent

Not at all satisfied

1

7%

Not very satisfied

1

7%

Somewhat satisfied

1

7%

Satisfied

6

43%

Very satisfied

5

36%

Grand Total

14

100%

Satisfaction with Student Technical Abilities

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all satisfied

3

9%

2

14%

5

11%

Not very satisfied

3

9%

1

7%

4

9%

Somewhat satisfied

0

0%

1

7%

1

2%

Satisfied

11

33%

4

29%

15

32%

Very satisfied

16

48%

6

43%

22

47%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Satisfaction with Level of Support and Recognition for Participation in the Program

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all satisfied

6

18%

2

14%

8

17%

Not satisfied

9

27%

4

29%

13

28%

Somewhat satisfied

3

9%

3

21%

6

13%

Satisfied

5

15%

4

29%

9

19%

Didn't expect any

9

27%

0

0%

9

19%

No Answer

1

3%

1

7%

2

4%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Overall Satisfaction with the Program

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all satisfied

2

6%

0

0%

2

4%

Not very satisfied

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

Somewhat satisfied

2

6%

2

14%

4

9%

Satisfied

21

64%

9

64%

30

64%

Very satisfied

7

21%

3

21%

10

21%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Feelings of Effectiveness as a Mentor

1994-1995 combined

1996

Aggregate

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Not at all effective

2

6%

1

7%

3

6%

Somewhat effective

1

3%

5

36%

6

13%

Effective

22

67%

6

43%

28

60%

Very effective

8

24%

2

14%

10

21%

Grand Total

33

100%

14

100%

47

100%

Potential effectiveness of the program in increasing the number of women choosing to pursue higher degrees in CS&E

1996

Total

Percent

Not at all effective

0

0%

Somewhat effective

1

7%

Effective

3

21%

Very effective

10

71%

Grand Total

14

100%

 

 

Previous

Next

Main Page